xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?
- From: Ed Davies <edavies AT nildram.co.uk>
- To: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:12:46 +0100
Elliotte Harold wrote:
....
What's in XOM are the actual unmodified Jaxen classes. If you're writing code that uses Jaxen APIs, adding full Jaxen to your classpath should cause no conflicts.
....
If some Jaxen classes are taken from the XOM jar and some from a Jaxen
jar further down the classpath, how can you be sure that they'll be no
conflict if the Jaxen jar is a later version?
-
[XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?,
Manfred Nysted Berry, 07/13/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?, Elliotte Harold, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?,
Michael Kay, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?,
Manfred Nysted Berry, 07/13/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?, Elliotte Harold, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?,
Elliotte Harold, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?,
Ed Davies, 07/13/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?, Elliotte Harold, 07/13/2006
- Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?, Elliotte Harold, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?,
Ed Davies, 07/13/2006
-
Re: [XOM-interest] Why is xom 1.1 only using parts of jaxen?,
Manfred Nysted Berry, 07/13/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.