xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches

From: Steve Loughran <steve.loughran AT gmail.com>
To: Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org, "John.Cowan" <jcowan AT reutershealth.com>
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:45:03 +0100

On 10/11/05, Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu> wrote:
> John.Cowan wrote:
>
> > OT: Is it better when reading from a Reader layered over an InputStream
> > to buffer the Reader, the InputStream, or both?
> >
>
> Surprisingly both. At least that's been my experience in the past.
> haven't checked lately.
>

wierd. Could be memory cache related;one thing buffers the disk, the
other buffers main memory. If only we had prefetch hints in java
machine code.

Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches, Elliotte Harold, 10/11/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches, John.Cowan, 10/11/2005
  - Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches, Elliotte Harold, 10/11/2005
    - Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches, Steve Loughran, 10/11/2005
      - Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches, Elliotte Harold, 10/11/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches, Wolfgang Hoschek, 10/12/2005