xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches
- From: "John.Cowan" <jcowan AT reutershealth.com>
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:17:50 -0400
Elliotte Harold scripsit:
> By any chance did you get any numbers on the effects of just replacing
> BufferedWriter with an unsynchronized version, independent of the other
> changes? I'm considering whether to mention this possibility in the next
> edition of Java I/O.
OT: Is it better when reading from a Reader layered over an InputStream
to buffer the Reader, the InputStream, or both?
--
John Cowan jcowan AT reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com
www.ccil.org/~cowan
The present impossibility of giving a scientific explanation is no proof
that there is no scientific explanation. The unexplained is not to be
identified with the unexplainable, and the strange and extraordinary
nature of a fact is not a justification for attributing it to powers
above nature. --The Catholic Encyclopedia, s.v. "telepathy" (1913)
-
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches,
Elliotte Harold, 10/11/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches,
John.Cowan, 10/11/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches,
Elliotte Harold, 10/11/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches,
Steve Loughran, 10/11/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches, Elliotte Harold, 10/11/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches,
Steve Loughran, 10/11/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches,
Elliotte Harold, 10/11/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches, Wolfgang Hoschek, 10/12/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] More Serializer performance patches,
John.Cowan, 10/11/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.