xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM deployment licensing issues
- From: "Kevin S. Clarke" <ksclarke AT stanford.edu>
- To: XOM-Interest <xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] XOM deployment licensing issues
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 19:16:31 -0000
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 12:03, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> At 2:53 PM -0400 6/3/03, Rogers Cadenhead wrote:
> >I think my licensing section (reproduced below) complies with XOM's
> >GNU Lesser Public License and Xerces' Apache Software License.
>
> I've heard people claim that the Apache and GPL license are
> incompatible because of warranty and naming issues, but IANALL (I am
> not a license lawyer.)
That's what the GNU project claims...
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses
Whether you want to take their opinion about what the GPL means is up to
you of course...
Kevin (also not a lawyer)
--
Kevin S. Clarke <ksclarke AT stanford.edu>
Lane Medical Library, Stanford University
-
[XOM-interest] XOM deployment licensing issues,
Rogers Cadenhead, 06/03/2003
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM deployment licensing issues,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 06/03/2003
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM deployment licensing issues,
Kevin S. Clarke, 06/03/2003
- [XOM-interest] XPath?, Nils_Kilden-Pedersen, 06/04/2003
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM deployment licensing issues,
Kevin S. Clarke, 06/03/2003
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM deployment licensing issues, John Cowan, 06/03/2003
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM deployment licensing issues,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 06/03/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.