stayfree AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Free, promotional email list for Stay Free! print magazine
List archive
- From: Carrie McLaren <carrie AT stayfreemagazine.org>
- To: stayfree AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc: werde AT nyc.rr.com
- Subject: Stay Free!/Illegal Art told to "cease and desist"
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:45:29 -0500
Ah, the saga of DJ Dangermouse continues. EMI sent out a cease and desist notice to Stay Free!/Illegal Art and about 150 other websites this week, claiming "willful violation of [copyright] laws." EMI wanted to prevent Grey Tuesday, an online protest of Capitol's attempt to squash Dangermouse's "Grey Album," from taking place. The New York Times article below has the crucial background info.
What this means for Stay Free! is as of yet unclear. I'd much rather report on other people's lawsuits than get dragged into one myself, but, having spent over a year praising artists who have stood up to this sort of corporate bullying, we can't very well duck out ourselves.... so we haven't removed the contested mp3s (online at http://www.illegal-art.org ), and don't plan to. With luck, Capitol will back down and realize that suing a bunch of marginal publishers is only going to bring more publicity to an album they'd like to suppress. But if they do come after us, we'll have a rock solid fair use argument. Prof. Zittrain's comment (below) notwithstanding, there are exactly zero laws that state that what we're doing is illegal. Nor, for that matter, are there laws forbidding Dangermouse from appropriating the Beatles's recordings -- these legal threats are all based on the precedent set by a single court case from the 1980s (See O'Sullivan v. Biz Markie, http://www.illegal-art.org/audio/historic.html ). A habit, in other words.
You can find the cease and desist letter on the Downhill Battle site (I would post it myself but I'm lazy... and, besides, the letters are all the same):
http://www.downhillbattle.org/grey/emi_cd_letter.html
And here's the man who signed it:
http://www.cll.com/images/attorneys/jensenc.jpg
all for now,
carrie
:::::
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/25/arts/music/25REMI.html
Defiant Downloads Rise From Underground
By BILL WERDE
Published: February 25, 2004
More than 300 Web sites and blogs staged a 24-hour online protest yesterday over a record company's efforts to stop them from offering downloadable copies of "The Grey Album." A popular underground collection of music, "The Grey Album" mixes tracks from the Beatles' classic White Album with raps from Jay-Z's latest release, "The Black Album."
The protesters billed the event as "Grey Tuesday," calling it "a day of coordinated civil disobedience," during which more than 150 sites offered the album for download. Recording industry lawyers saw it as 24 hours of mass copyright infringement and sent letters to the Web sites demanding that they not follow through on the protest.
"The Grey Album" is a critically praised collection of tracks created by Brian Burton, a Los Angeles D.J. who records as Danger Mouse. Mr. Burton created the album by layering Jay-Z's a cappella raps from "The Black Album," released on Jay-Z's Roc-A-Fella label, over music he arranged using melodies and rhythms from "The Beatles," commonly known as the White Album.
Mr. Burton did not seek permission from EMI, which owns the publishing rights to the White Album. When EMI learned that Mr. Burton was distributing "The Grey Album" early this month, its lawyers sent him a cease-and-desist letter, and Mr. Burton complied.
EMI views any distribution, reproduction or public performance of "The Grey Album" to be a copyright violation. "They may say EMI is trying to stop an artwork," said Jeanne Meyer, an EMI spokeswoman, referring to the Web sites, "but they neglect to understand that there is a well-established market for licensing samples, and Mr. Burton didn't participate in it."
Some protesters say "The Grey Album" illustrates a need for revisions in copyright law. They say that sampling should be allowed under fair use of copyrighted material, or that a system of fair compensation should be created to allow for sampling.
"To a lot of artists and bedroom D.J.'s, who are now able to easily edit and remix digital files of their favorite songs using inexpensive computers and software, pop music has become source material for sonic collages," said Nicholas Reville, a co-founder of Downhill Battle, an organization of music industry activists who promoted Grey Tuesday.
Jonathan Zittrain, a director of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School, said the issue is indeed a gray one. "As a matter of pure legal doctrine, the Grey Tuesday protest is breaking the law, end of story," Mr. Zittrain said. "But copyright law was written with a particular form of industry in mind. The flourishing of information technology gives amateurs and home-recording artists powerful tools to build and share interesting, transformative, and socially valuable art drawn from pieces of popular culture. There's no place to plug such an important cultural sea change into the current legal regime."
He said that under copyright law a judge can impose damages as high as $150,000 for each infringement.
To create a collection like "The Grey Album" legally, an artist would first have to get permission to use copyrighted material. Then he would have to negotiate compensation with the copyright holder. Many artists, however, like the Beatles, will not allow their music to be sampled. But even if permission is granted, it is common for a copyright holder to request more than 50 percent of publishing rights for a new song created from the copyrighted work. So if Mr. Burton had been able to get permission to make "The Grey Album" from both the Beatles and Jay-Z, he would probably have had to give away more than 100 percent of his publishing rights.
Around the same time Mr. Burton received his cease-and-desist letter, his album was receiving critical acclaim in Rolling Stone magazine. The album took on a distribution life of its own online, circulated via file-trading sites and on e-Bay, where bootleg CD's were selling for as much as $80 yesterday. Two weeks ago EMI issued cease-and-desist letters to an undisclosed number of record stores and e-Bbay sellers.
Downhill Battle went live last Wednesday with a site devoted to the protest, Greytuesday.org. In 12 hours it had more than 40 sites signed on to participate. Within two days, Greytuesday.org reached the top ranking on Blogdex and Popdex, Web sites that track which sites are being linked to from blogs.
Monday night lawyers for EMI issued cease-and-desist letters to more than 150 Web sites participating in the protest. The letter said distribution of "The Grey Album" "will subject you to serious legal remedies for willful violation of the laws."
By yesterday afternoon some of the Web masters of the protesting sites said they had served 85 to 100 copies of the album, while other reported as many as 1,000 downloads.
--
Carrie McLaren
Editor, Stay Free!
www.stayfreemagazine.org
www.illegal-art.org
718.398.9324
- Stay Free!/Illegal Art told to "cease and desist", Carrie McLaren, 02/25/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.