Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-users - Re: [SM-Users] Sylpheed gtk+2

sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Sourcemage Users List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Rafael George <rgeorge AT yatusabes.com>" <rgeorge AT yatusabes.com>
  • To: sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Users] Sylpheed gtk+2
  • Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:33:33 -0400

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:23:40 +0100
Ladislav Hagara <hgr AT vabo.cz> wrote:
I think is better to modify the old gtk+ sylpheed spell because there is a
patch for the gtk+2 version.

> Sylpheed is based on gtk+, you really need it.
> I found sylpheed-gtk2
> http://sylpheed-gtk2.sourceforge.net/sylpheed-gtk2.html.en , it is sylpheed
> based on gtk+2.
>
> I created a spell for it, after testing, correcting it could go to grimoire
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5568
> Please download it and test it.
>
> Is it better to have new spell or modify sylpheed spell to choose gtk or
> gtk2 ? I voto for new spell.
>
> - lace -
>
>
> > Hi guys, i want to make an option for the sylpheed spell so i can patch
> > to use gtk+2
> >
> > i tried with the CONFIGURE file like in vim but it dosent work, so i
> > tried with the DEPENDS file i notice that if i add an option that says
> > optional_depend "gtk+2" maybe it can ask for the gtk+2 lib but it will
> > still installing the gtk+ lib that i really dosent need cuz i will have
> > the gtk+2 lib, i hope any of you can understand what im saying and give
> > me a hand with this. Thx
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Users mailing list
> SM-Users AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-users
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page