Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-sorcery - [SM-Sorcery] Confusion about perforce access?

sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Eric D. Schabell M.Sc." <sorcery AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [SM-Sorcery] Confusion about perforce access?
  • Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:43:33 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

There seems to be some confusion about what I have removed with the names
below. I have removed only your perforce access for SORCERY DEVEL. The rest
that you had is still there.

I have also cleaned up the sorcery team on the org chart to reflect the
developers that have been active lately or that have responed to my inquiries
about being active with something related to sorcery.


On Friday 12 December 2003 16:50, Eric D. Schabell M.Sc. wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> As I have not received any answers from the following persons, I have
> removed them from the sorcery perforce access list. It only means that
> fixes will have to be submitted via attaching a diff to the bug in
> bugzilla:
>
> pierre_abbat
> robin_cook
> sergey_lipnevich
> unet
>
> This is to only allow active developers access to the repository. If you
> wish to become active, please let me know and I will assign you some work
> (or better yet, accept a bug or two!).
>
> Thanks for your help up to now.

- --

/**
* Eric D. Schabell M.Sc.
* Sorcery Team Lead
* nick -> erics
**/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/2u1VruUhvfIGbDIRAjh8AKCXyv67do6562gM3OHkbJj1RyL1hwCfcl92
4EOt1TR8zXtf0SWPAxX51EY=
=J8c+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page