Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-sorcery - Re: [SM-Sorcery]Static base spells

sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Static base spells
  • Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:32:07 +0100

If i'm not mistaken, if the apps are statically linked, every app loads
it's own version of the libs, which would lead to much more memory
usage.

On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 04:16:19AM -0500, Dufflebunk wrote:
> What would be the advantage of having two copies of bzip over just one
> static copy?
>
> On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 03:01, Andrew wrote:
> > one alternative may be to have an alternative set of 'backup' or 'safe'
> > utils. Sorcery could use those if a spell (like glibc) has the "USE_SAFE"
> > variable set or something. Then you can have your nice dynamic executables
> > the rest of the time.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page