Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-sorcery - Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]

sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • To: "Julian v. Bock" <julian AT openit.de>
  • Cc: Reapl Paratorn <reapl AT reapl.net>, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]
  • Date: 22 Oct 2002 08:52:19 -0400

It would only be something along the lines of:
Warning, <spell 1> was listed as a requirement for <spell 2>.
Are you sure you want to remove <spell 2>? [y]



On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 07:26, Julian v. Bock wrote:
> Hi
>
> >>>>> "D" == Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net> writes:
>
> D> One other piece
> D> we need to get in is dependency checking for dispelling, which
> D> currently does not exist.
>
> I am not sure that we want this. One of the nice things about smgl was
> the loose dependency system. If a spell gets broken because a library
> was removed, a cast --fix solves the problem. If you remove something
> that was only needed to compile (not run) another spell, nothing
> complains.
>
> Julian
--


Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
-----------------
PGP public key at
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3327A9A5
F1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page