sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]
- From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: "Julian v. Bock" <julian AT openit.de>
- Cc: Reapl Paratorn <reapl AT reapl.net>, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]
- Date: 22 Oct 2002 08:52:19 -0400
It would only be something along the lines of:
Warning, <spell 1> was listed as a requirement for <spell 2>.
Are you sure you want to remove <spell 2>? [y]
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 07:26, Julian v. Bock wrote:
> Hi
>
> >>>>> "D" == Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net> writes:
>
> D> One other piece
> D> we need to get in is dependency checking for dispelling, which
> D> currently does not exist.
>
> I am not sure that we want this. One of the nice things about smgl was
> the loose dependency system. If a spell gets broken because a library
> was removed, a cast --fix solves the problem. If you remove something
> that was only needed to compile (not run) another spell, nothing
> complains.
>
> Julian
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
-----------------
PGP public key at
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3327A9A5
F1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Andrew, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Nick Jennings, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Andrew, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Nick Jennings, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Andrew, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Nick Jennings, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Robin, 10/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Andrew, 10/21/2002
- RE: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Reapl Paratorn, 10/21/2002
- RE: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Dufflebunk, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Julian v. Bock, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Dufflebunk, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Eric Sandall, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Dufflebunk, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Eric Sandall, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Dufflebunk, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Arwed von Merkatz, 10/22/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.