sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]
- From: julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock)
- To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- Cc: Reapl Paratorn <reapl AT reapl.net>, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:26:09 +0200
Hi
>>>>> "D" == Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net> writes:
D> One other piece
D> we need to get in is dependency checking for dispelling, which
D> currently does not exist.
I am not sure that we want this. One of the nice things about smgl was
the loose dependency system. If a spell gets broken because a library
was removed, a cast --fix solves the problem. If you remove something
that was only needed to compile (not run) another spell, nothing
complains.
Julian
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Seth Woolley, 10/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Andrew, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Nick Jennings, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Andrew, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Nick Jennings, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Andrew, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Nick Jennings, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Robin, 10/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Andrew, 10/21/2002
- RE: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Reapl Paratorn, 10/21/2002
- RE: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Dufflebunk, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Julian v. Bock, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Dufflebunk, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Eric Sandall, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Dufflebunk, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Eric Sandall, 10/22/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Dufflebunk, 10/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case],
Seth Woolley, 10/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case], Arwed von Merkatz, 10/22/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.