Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-sorcery - Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]

sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock)
  • To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • Cc: Reapl Paratorn <reapl AT reapl.net>, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery][Fwd: xfree86 as a special case]
  • Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:26:09 +0200

Hi

>>>>> "D" == Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net> writes:

D> One other piece
D> we need to get in is dependency checking for dispelling, which
D> currently does not exist.

I am not sure that we want this. One of the nice things about smgl was
the loose dependency system. If a spell gets broken because a library
was removed, a cast --fix solves the problem. If you remove something
that was only needed to compile (not run) another spell, nothing
complains.

Julian




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page