sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Mark Andrews <msasgl AT msa-enterprises.com>
- To: Tony Smith <tony AT smee.org>
- Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re[2]: [SM-Sorcery]libbdb (was libvariable)
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:20:13 +0100
Hello Tony,
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 5:45:18 PM, you wrote:
TS> Another trick you might consider is using "kill -0 $(cat $1.LOCK)".
Thanks for the suggestion. I'm rethinking a little on this routine
anyway at the moment - to allow for a process requesting a lock it
already has. This would still deadlock with the routine I posted
yesterday. I knew it was crude, just not realised how crude ;-)
--
Best regards,
Mark mailto:msasgl AT msa-enterprises.com
-
[SM-Sorcery]libbdb (was libvariable),
Mark Andrews, 10/08/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]libbdb (was libvariable),
Mark Andrews, 10/08/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]libbdb (was libvariable),
Tony Smith, 10/08/2002
- Re[2]: [SM-Sorcery]libbdb (was libvariable), Mark Andrews, 10/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]libbdb (was libvariable),
Tony Smith, 10/08/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]libbdb (was libvariable), Dufflebunk, 10/08/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]libbdb (was libvariable),
Mark Andrews, 10/08/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.