sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- To: sm-sorcery <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]cvs.sourcemage.org
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:15:12 -0700
cvs.sourcemage.org is a dual PII 400mhz system with several hundred
megs of RAM, I don't think it's the speed of the system.
If anything I think the sourcemage repository was set up kinda
'kooky' when it was originally designed on savannah. Theres only
one real module (sourcemage) and everything in the subdir (grimoire,
sorcery, etc.) is not a real module, but only a "virtual" module,
meaning you can check out one of those subdirs with the "keyword"
of it's name. Basically treat it as if it was a module, but it isn't.
I think this means logs files, and history etc. is being processed
all together... that's allot of files....
I will try to modularize it out, but I don't want to break things
:) so I have been putting it off.. when I get a chance I will though.
Though I have not been experiencing any delays except for when I do
a commit (sometimes it delays for a while after sending the emails).
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:30:30PM +0200, Julian v. Bock wrote:
> Hi
>
> >>>>> "RA" == Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org> writes:
>
> RA> What /exactly/ is the problem?
>
> A cvs update (I do always a cvs -n up before comitting to get a list
> of everything that has changed) for a single spell dir takes a long
> time. If I do an update in the devel or libs dir I don't get a
> response from the server and cvs times out after about 15 minutes.
>
> Since the update of a single spell dir works (slowly) there might be
> only a process that consumes all the cpu time.
>
> I had this problem the first time about 15 hours ago.
>
> Julian
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
>
-
[SM-Sorcery]cvs.sourcemage.org,
Julian v. Bock, 10/03/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]cvs.sourcemage.org, Eric Sandall, 10/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]cvs.sourcemage.org,
Ryan Abrams, 10/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]cvs.sourcemage.org,
Julian v. Bock, 10/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]cvs.sourcemage.org,
Nick Jennings, 10/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]cvs.sourcemage.org,
Julian v. Bock, 10/03/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]cvs.sourcemage.org, Eric Schabell, 10/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]cvs.sourcemage.org,
Julian v. Bock, 10/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]cvs.sourcemage.org,
Nick Jennings, 10/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]cvs.sourcemage.org,
Julian v. Bock, 10/03/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.