sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Differences between sorcery and LFS
- From: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
- To: Mark Andrews <msasgl AT msa-enterprises.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Evraire <evraire AT tuwg.com>, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Differences between sorcery and LFS
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:18:46 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Time has been my biggest constraint at the moment, I also want to
> check the hardware config side of Knoppix to see if it can be used to
> predefine kernel and module options for compilation. The idea of
> having a machine specific optimised kernel as the first one on
> the box kinda appeals to me. Particularly if I only need to say "cast
> linux-auto" to get it ;-)
I think an autoconfiguring kernel spell would definitely be cool. This
might be useful, though it looks like its been inactive since Nov 2001:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/kautoconfigure/
"This tools will automagically configure the linux kernel, detecting
hardware and used sotware protocols. The project will be (maybe) included
in kernel 2.5, with the new CML2. We provide also a stand-alone tool to
configure 2.4.x kernels."
-
[SM-Sorcery]Differences between sorcery and LFS,
Jonathan Evraire, 09/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Differences between sorcery and LFS,
Mark Andrews, 09/17/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Differences between sorcery and LFS, Casey Harkins, 09/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Differences between sorcery and LFS,
Mark Andrews, 09/17/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.