sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]bugzilla bugs
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 12:08:58 -0700
I'd preffer that if you are 'accepting a bug' you mark it as 'accepted'.
Sometimes we have a better idea of a way something needs to be implemented,
specifically if we are working on other things affecting the implementation
method. So we 'assign' them to ourselves so no one else implements it
the "wrong way".
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 03:16:31PM -0400, Dufflebunk wrote:
> Generaly if I see a bug that I know how to fix and should have time soon to
> fix, I'll assign it to me but leave it as NEW until I'm ready to work on
> it. That way I've got a "TODO" list, but I'm not stopping anyone from doing
> something if they have time. Is this a good practice?
>
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:01:40 -0700
> Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Just a note, if a bug has been assigned to you, or you have transfered
> > the
> > bug to yourself, please accept the bug as 'assigned' to yourself. Any
> > bug that has a status of 'NEW' is fair game for anyone.
> >
> > Especially with me, because I currently get all new bugs. So if you are
> > looking for some bugs to fix, please check the bugs that are NEW pointing
> > to me.
> >
> > Soon, new bugs will default be assigned to a new list. sorcery-bugs or
> > something. We'll keep you informed.
> >
> > --
> > Nick Jennings
> > Sorcery Team Lead
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Sorcery mailing list
> > SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
>
>
> --
>
>
> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
> -----------------
> PGP public key at
> http://wwwkeys.ch.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x92B5D3F1
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
>
-
[SM-Sorcery]bugzilla bugs,
Nick Jennings, 09/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]bugzilla bugs,
Dufflebunk, 09/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]bugzilla bugs, Nick Jennings, 09/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]bugzilla bugs,
Dufflebunk, 09/02/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.