sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]bugzilla bugs
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 15:16:31 -0400
Generaly if I see a bug that I know how to fix and should have time soon to
fix, I'll assign it to me but leave it as NEW until I'm ready to work on it.
That way I've got a "TODO" list, but I'm not stopping anyone from doing
something if they have time. Is this a good practice?
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:01:40 -0700
Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just a note, if a bug has been assigned to you, or you have transfered the
> bug to yourself, please accept the bug as 'assigned' to yourself. Any
> bug that has a status of 'NEW' is fair game for anyone.
>
> Especially with me, because I currently get all new bugs. So if you are
> looking for some bugs to fix, please check the bugs that are NEW pointing
> to me.
>
> Soon, new bugs will default be assigned to a new list. sorcery-bugs or
> something. We'll keep you informed.
>
> --
> Nick Jennings
> Sorcery Team Lead
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
-----------------
PGP public key at
http://wwwkeys.ch.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x92B5D3F1
-
[SM-Sorcery]bugzilla bugs,
Nick Jennings, 09/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]bugzilla bugs,
Dufflebunk, 09/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]bugzilla bugs, Nick Jennings, 09/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]bugzilla bugs,
Dufflebunk, 09/02/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.