sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- To: "Nathan Doss" <ndoss AT mtlaurel.org>
- Cc: sm-sorcery <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Second proposal for edit_file()
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 00:24:36 -0500
I tend to agree with this approach.
Simple == good. I am one of the converted. :)
-Ryan
On Sunday, September 1, 2002, at 11:35 PM, Nathan Doss wrote:
Jon wrote:
As far as I know, there's never been a single problem reported
with doing ${EDITOR:-nano} $1.
You've convinced me. edit_file is being changed to simply be:
edit_file() {
${EDITOR:-nano} $1
}
--
Nathan Doss ndoss AT mtlaurel.org
_______________________________________________
SM-Sorcery mailing list
SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Second proposal for edit_file(),
Nathan Doss, 09/01/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Second proposal for edit_file(), Jon Svendsen, 09/01/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Second proposal for edit_file(),
Nathan Doss, 09/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Second proposal for edit_file(), Ryan Abrams, 09/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Second proposal for edit_file(),
Robin Cook, 09/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Second proposal for edit_file(), Eric Sandall, 09/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Second proposal for edit_file(), Harley J Pig, 09/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Second proposal for edit_file(), Nathan Doss, 09/02/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.