sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here
List archive
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13938] Hooks support in sorcery...
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT bugs.sourcemage.org
- To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13938] Hooks support in sorcery...
- Date: 28 Apr 2010 05:23:29 -0000
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13938
--- Comment #29 from Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik <ruskie+bugs AT codemages.net>
2010-04-28 00:23:26 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Do the spell file exclusion in a new function (run_spellfile_hook?), so it
> doesn't need to be duplicated. You can also achieve nicer calling by making
> it
> take two arguments: spellfile pre|post. This needs to be as efficient as
> possible, as it will be run a lot.
Hmm run_hook will work then for the exclussions just need to split the call
into two param state.
> MAIL_REPORT_HOOK does not need to be global and initialised as empty. It's
> not
> needed at all - you can pass all that info by grouping the commands with {}.
Erm...
> Apart from that, the mail and sound hooks are fine. The cleantext should
> eventually be in a spell, as it definitely won't get included and the
> term_title one should be trimmed down, since about half of the functions are
> redundant.
Yeah just automated it at the moment.
> The calls to init_hooks look fine.
>
> There's plenty of misformatting; some as a regression.
Hmm I'll look into it though not really sure what to look for but will try and
see.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13938] Hooks support in sorcery...,
bugzilla-daemon, 04/27/2010
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13938] Hooks support in sorcery..., bugzilla-daemon, 04/27/2010
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 13938] Hooks support in sorcery..., bugzilla-daemon, 04/28/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.