sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here
List archive
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7728] x86_32 and x86_64 archspecs are wrong
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT metalab.unc.edu
- To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7728] x86_32 and x86_64 archspecs are wrong
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 02:49:46 -0500
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7728
------- Additional Comments From benoit.papillault AT sourcemage.org 2004-12-01
02:49 -------
Great i did not know that gcc 3.4.3 was in devel grimoire. Are there problem
using it instead of gcc 3.3.3? gcc 3.4.3 is needed on ppc for instance to
compile glibc NPTL and it fails to compile yaboot (but a patch is already
available to fix yaboot).
Thus, why not considering moving gcc 3.4.3 to test and then stable?
One last question, who (in the gcc team?) decided on the meaning of "k8" or
"athlon-xp" names? is there a documentation about them? So far, I found
nothing
except the list of the names in the man page. Is that enought?
Benoit PAPILLAULT, ISO Guru
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7728] x86_32 and x86_64 archspecs are wrong,
bugzilla-daemon, 12/01/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7728] x86_32 and x86_64 archspecs are wrong, bugzilla-daemon, 12/01/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7728] x86_32 and x86_64 archspecs are wrong, bugzilla-daemon, 12/01/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7728] x86_32 and x86_64 archspecs are wrong, bugzilla-daemon, 12/01/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7728] x86_32 and x86_64 archspecs are wrong, bugzilla-daemon, 12/01/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7728] x86_32 and x86_64 archspecs are wrong, bugzilla-daemon, 12/01/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7728] x86_32 and x86_64 archspecs are wrong, bugzilla-daemon, 12/04/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 7728] x86_32 and x86_64 archspecs are wrong, bugzilla-daemon, 12/04/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.