sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here
List archive
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT metalab.unc.edu
- To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:21:55 -0500
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5487
------- Additional Comments From eric AT sandall.us 2004-02-26 17:21 -------
The difference isn't. The "x86_64" is how they name the folders (they convert
the "-" to "_"), but otherwise it's x86-64, and they're the same.
Look into the linux spell and specifically at my sparc64 line, you may have to
do that for the opteron, though since the Opteron can use a 32-bit kernel you
may need more trickery. However, always compiling the kernel for 64-bit on the
Opteron wouldn't be a bad thing, I'd hope.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation,
bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation, bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation, bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation, bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation, bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.