sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Bugs for Sorcery are reported here
List archive
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT metalab.unc.edu
- To: sm-sorcery-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:30:41 -0500
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5487
------- Additional Comments From eric AT sandall.us 2004-02-26 11:30 -------
Since the Opteron is cool it can work with 32- or 64-bit applications, but I'm
not sure if the kernel (like on SPARC64) is required to be 64-bit no matter
what. I'd say -m32 is fine for now until we hear otherwise.
The linux kernel calls it x86_64, but Intel's new chip is called that as
well, I
think, or maybe it's ia64e or some such. I believe we've been separating them
into company/chip, and RH, Mandrake, SuSE, and I think a few others call it
amd64 (which I like).
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
[SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation,
bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation, bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation, bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation, bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2004
- [SM-Sorcery-Bugs] [Bug 5487] x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX and Opteron) optimisation, bugzilla-daemon, 02/26/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.