sm-security AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Security bugs are reported here via bugzilla
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-security AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Security] Fw: [PATCH] ioperm fix
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Seth Woolley said:
> Thanks Niki... I made a patches/ioperm file for it. When perforce comes
> back up, either W0rf or I can just add it and announce it.
>
> I'm testing it right now.
Should this go in the SMGL-patches file so the user can select it? Or
have it's own, like ptrace? Perhaps both this and ptrace should be in the
SMGL patch?
Or should we separate them all? We should have consistency, either put
all patches from the SMGL team into the SMGL patch, or have them all
separate.
-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Security] Fw: [PATCH] ioperm fix,
Niki Guldbrand, 05/22/2003
-
Re: [SM-Security] Fw: [PATCH] ioperm fix,
Seth Woolley, 05/22/2003
-
Re: [SM-Security] Fw: [PATCH] ioperm fix,
Eric Sandall, 05/23/2003
- Re: [SM-Security] Fw: [PATCH] ioperm fix, Seth Woolley, 05/23/2003
-
Re: [SM-Security] Fw: [PATCH] ioperm fix,
Eric Sandall, 05/23/2003
-
Re: [SM-Security] Fw: [PATCH] ioperm fix,
Seth Woolley, 05/22/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.