sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 27029 for review
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Cc: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>, duane_malcolm <d.malcolm AT auckland.ac.nz>, Ladislav Hagara <hgr AT vabo.cz>, Unet <unet AT sourcemage.org>, Justin Rocha <jrocha AT sourcemage.org>, Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>, Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>, Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>, Vladimir Vydra <vvydra AT sourcemage.org>, "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>, Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>, martin_ruderer <martin AT lddd.org>, dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net, Chris Brien <p4 AT negativezero.plus.com>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 27029 for review
- Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 04:46:17 +0100
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 06:48:02PM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>:
> > It works for some, at least. Some spells don't pay attention to our
> > LDFLAGS, others may fail, I don't know. I do know bash compiles
> > staticly.
> >
> > Does anyone have any idea how many spells will actualy fail? If it's a
> > significant number, we can add a warning about that one, '++iffy' ;)
>
> The ones that are actually important for this are those in basesystem
> (that's
> why I wanted this, so I could get chroot to actually work on my SPARC), and
> all
> of them (except gettext and glibc, which I couldn't get to compile, which I
> needed to chroot into the already partially-installed SMGL system, which I
> couldn't do since everything there was linked against Gentoo's libs, blah
> blah)
> worked with -static that I can tell.
Anything that uses X will probably fail, i tried some static builds in
the last days, and all of them failed with -static because of xfree not
installing static libs. KDE also doesn't build static libs, most of
gnome does (all i checked).
--
Arwed v. Merkatz
Grimoire Guru for video
Grimoire Guru for xfce
Sourcemage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 27029 for review,
Paul, 02/07/2004
-
[SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 27029 for review,
Eric Sandall, 02/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 27029 for review,
Andrew, 02/07/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 27029 for review, Eric Sandall, 02/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 27029 for review,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/07/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 27029 for review, Eric Sandall, 02/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 27029 for review,
Andrew, 02/07/2004
-
[SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 27029 for review,
Eric Sandall, 02/07/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.