sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:14:26 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
z-rejected is Jose and Geoffrey.
I don't truly understand what each of these spells is/does , nor do I really
understand the author's license policy. But if it's possible to get approval
from him for our spell to install his sources in the manner he requires then
I believe they should be in the main grimoire.
Hamish
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:51, Paul wrote:
> You can have a djb section in the z-rejected grimoire... talk to Hamish
> about that, he maintains the grimoire I believe.
>
> On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 14:22, shivaken wrote:
> > Hi, I send a mail and bug report to contribute spells of djb tools.
> >
> > http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5563
> >
> > Djb tools are very unique and useful, but their license is not compatible
> > to OSI's one. That license limits re-distributing binaries.
> >
> > Then it seems that these spells have to go z-rejected.
> >
> > And djb tools have dependency to their core software daemontools and
> > ucspi-tcp. So I want to suggest to create a djb section to maintain them.
> >
> > On the other hand, adding each spells to existing z-sections is not bad.
> > Because user obtains a information about a spell from the section name.
> >
> > Which is better?
- --
IRC nick: drmoriarty
SMGL co-conspirator
# Do You SMGL!?
# http://www.sourcemage.org/
# Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
ANTI-SPAM WARNING: I delete any html message from my server without reading
Please use text only
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAFoBe8fSufZR6424RAoq/AJ9oLY4CPbkAopR39bnGepk/3CuJBQCcCo61
sWcWLCJvloKcqKV0JSAXCQ4=
=V/2b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
shivaken, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
Paul, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
Paul, 01/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?, Jose Bernardo Silva, 01/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?, Hamish Greig, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
Paul, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
Hamish Greig, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
shivaken, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
shivaken, 01/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?, Eric Sandall, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
shivaken, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 01/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?, Eric Sandall, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
shivaken, 01/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?, Eric Sandall, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 01/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?, Pierre Abbat, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 01/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Where djb spells should go?,
Paul, 01/27/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.