sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.6 vs 2.4 headers
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:34:47 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:17, Hamish Greig wrote:
> in devel, marked as WIP, there is a new spell 2.4-kernel-headers and the
> lilo spell uses it in the fashion I intended. Sorcery needs a one line
> change to handle the SOLO file instead or reading it from
> /var/lib/sorcery/solo (a patch, cast.diff, in the lilo spell dir, will fix
> this, it could be changed to use both though)
> I have extensively tested this here, but am interested in comments.
> Is this a good solution for us ?
> I currently know of 14 spells guaranteed not to build against 2.6 headers
> ( sure there are more, these are just the few I know of), for now it
> doesn't seem enough for any major sorcery changes, and an extra depend and
> 6 lines added to BUILD seems an acceptable solution.
> Comments ?
> Hamish
>
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5282
has been filed for this addition to cast (the patch has been updated to use
bothe the old file and the new $SCRIPT_DIRECTORY/SOLO file)
Hamish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/4Waq8fSufZR6424RAr2HAJ908Ju/nfS238dDrBdxzLS0U+1W7gCePGnP
vnVi9bGKpMXCrfhBkMqKs3k=
=9c/1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Grimoire] 2.6 vs 2.4 headers,
Hamish Greig, 12/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.6 vs 2.4 headers,
Hamish Greig, 12/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.6 vs 2.4 headers,
Hamish Greig, 12/18/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.6 vs 2.4 headers, Hamish Greig, 12/19/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.6 vs 2.4 headers,
Hamish Greig, 12/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.6 vs 2.4 headers,
Hamish Greig, 12/18/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.