sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Stable grimoire
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:51:26 -0500
Is 1 highest priority, or is 5? I was never too sure of that. And what
would be the diff between a Critical bug of priority 4 and a Minor bug
of priority 2? That's why I leave the priority alone.
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 13:37, Andrew wrote:
> Maybe we should up the priority of these bugs and start actually using
> that feature of bugzilla? We could have a rule for not releasing an iso
> (pre isos are okay) with any priority 1 bugs. I think (with the risk
> of sounding hypocritical) that having a stable iso and grimoire should
> be something we all work for, not just a few of us.
>
> hamish:
> Its pretty easy to make prometheus do this, just override some of the
> BUGCLI_* variables in /etc/prometheus/pm-config.
--
De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.
What is that funny looking stuff in the attachment?
http://www.technomom.com/cynthia/pgp/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Grimoire] Stable grimoire,
Hamish Greig, 11/26/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Stable grimoire,
Andrew, 11/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Stable grimoire,
Paul Mahon, 11/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Stable grimoire, Andrew, 11/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Stable grimoire, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 11/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Stable grimoire, Hamish Greig, 11/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Stable grimoire,
Paul Mahon, 11/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Stable grimoire,
Laurent Wandrebeck, 11/27/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Stable grimoire, Hamish Greig, 11/27/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Stable grimoire,
Andrew, 11/27/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.