Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] arooga ... arooga

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
  • To: Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] arooga ... arooga
  • Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:32:10 +1000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Oh well this one is easy to fix.
changing to devel sorcery via the sorcery GUI doesn't automatically update
sorcery. You will still have to manually run sorcery update.
Twice maybe as the first one will start spewing error messages about changes
and will need to be ctrl-c'ed
In my experience with 4 machines here the depends provides change in devel
sorcery works great with test grimoire
The "only" explanation for this behaviour is that devel sorcery has been
selected but not installed.
Hamish

On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 04:13, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>:
> > hehe
> > here I am !
> > test grimoire only works with devel sorcery for a little while due to
> > depends==requires now in devel sorcery.
> > I "had" to finish off my conversion of xfree86 based optional_depends to
> > the
> >
> > new x11-libs x11-server style in the test grimoire and that meant only
> > using
> >
> > devel sorcery (quite workable due to heroic efforts from sorcery Team)
> > So, summary
> > 1) test grimoire needs devel sorcery
> > 2) "afraid of devel sorcery" == "must use stable grimoire until next
> > sorcery
> >
> > release"
> > THe test grimoire "does" have a message in it telling you this (displayed
> > during scribe update) but if you are adding the grimoire after a fresh
> > install then you probably wouldn't get the message.
> > Hamish
> >
> > ps I saw your query a few hours ago but thought you must be sick of
> > talking to
> > me so waited for someone else to give you the details. :)
>
> He did mention that he was using 'sorcery devel and test grimoire' in his
> first message. So we have these 3 scenarios:
>
> 1) He isn't using devel sorcery, but stable
> 2) Devel sorcery is broken wrt depends on providers
> 3) The providers are broken. Are they all supposed to be 'x11-libs' or
> 'X11-LIBS'?
>
> -sandalle

- --
IRC nick: drmoriarty
SMGL co-conspirator
#Do You SMGL!?
# Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
# http://www.sourcemage.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/gMYe8fSufZR6424RAnIEAJwNo7dCxzr3KIwp61m/bj5JUF6muwCdEf4p
/6Zlck8iMlRN8IHtFNqHKIw=
=GfKn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page