sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: "Jose Bernardo Silva" <jbs AT bandos.homelinux.com>
- To: Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Tony Smith <tony AT smee.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 20:42:02 +0000
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:52:14 -0500, Geoffrey Derber wrote
> Dufflebunk wrote:
> > I'm not a guru, so my opinion in this matter doesn't matter. I will;
> > however, point out that Tony is the /most/ experienced user of p4 here by
> > far. His opinion on the problems should be very carefuly considered. I
> > thought that a minimal devel would be nice too, until these points were
> > brought up, now I'm not so sure.
> >
>
> I think until there is a solution to the issues Tony brought up.
> I'm going to have to agree.
Just having read the whole thread, I also vote we keep a full devel grimoire.
---
Jose Bernardo B R Silva | Source Mage GNU/Linux Section Guru
jbernardo AT sourcemage.org | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://counter.li.org #245602
http://cosmos.oninetspeed.pt/jose.bernardo
jbs AT bandos.homelinux.com
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire,
Dufflebunk, 09/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire, Andrew, 09/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire, Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.