sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:56:10 -0700
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 02:50:51PM -0400, Dufflebunk wrote:
> I'm not a guru, so my opinion in this matter doesn't matter. I will;
> however, point out that Tony is the /most/ experienced user of p4 here by
> far. His opinion on the problems should be very carefuly considered. I
> thought that a minimal devel would be nice too, until these points were
> brought up, now I'm not so sure.
>
I agree. I used to think a minimal devel was better, but tony knows all
about perforce, and if he thinks this is a bad idea, i am not going to
argue about it with him.
integrating from devel to test isnt _that_ hard, heres all i do
<make changes devel>
run the following script with section/spell as the argument
#!/bin/sh
p4 submit
cd ~/sgl/
p4 integ devel/$1/... test/$1/...
p4 resolve -as
p4 submit
pretty simple really, and im sure it could be generalized to work on
anyone's setup.
lets get back to the stuff that really matters
-Andrew
--
________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt AT sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot AT t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | |
|Grimoire Guru ham/smgl, Porting Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com |
|Author and Maintainer of Prometheus | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpO4t2qpxfQK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire,
Dufflebunk, 09/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire, Andrew, 09/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire,
Geoffrey Derber, 09/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Smaller devel grimoire, Jose Bernardo Silva, 09/17/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.