Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: php-pear section?

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • To: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
  • Cc: Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: php-pear section?
  • Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:14:55 -0000

Don't we have a perl-cpan spell which is for a similar purpose, but for
Perl (/me surpresses a gag)? Shouldn't we maintain a little consistency
and make a php-pear section and leave the php and php-devel spells where
they are?

On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 16:56, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Eric Sandall wrote:
>
> >Sergey A. Lipnevich said:
> >
> >
> >>I'm up against 120+ packages in the PEAR library (http://pear.php.net/)
> >>and I think the easiest way of creating a spell for them is to create a
> >>spell for each package, because they have dependencies among themselves
> >>and are updated independently. I'd like to create a new section, php or
> >>php-pear, and create new spells there. I think it would be the right
> >>thing to if existing spells are moved into this section, primarily php
> >>and php-dev, but that is not necessary. Please let me know what do you
> >>think.
> >>
> >I'd say call it 'php', as other things besides PEAR-only will be in there
> >(php, php-dev, but that's about it, IIRC), but if 'php-pear' makes more
> >sense to you, that's fine as well.
> >
> I take it as "yes" from the Grimoire Leader :-). I like `php' more too.
> Thanks!
>
> Sergey.
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Grimoire mailing list
> SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page