Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 13731 for review

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
  • To: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>
  • Cc: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 13731 for review
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:21:40 -0400

Geoffrey Derber wrote:

Geoffrey Derber wrote:

Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:

Alternatively, we could do some post-update processing to wring CVS/Entries into format whihc is a)correct b) good for us to checksum. For example, assuming CVS update brings timestamps to "the time of last change to this file", we could replace dates in CVS/Entries with the dates on the respective files. That would bring two checked out copies of CVS sources in full sync on two PCs. Would it?
BTW, I'm mirroring this into SM-Grimoire just in case somebody wants to join in.
Thanks!

Sergey.

It's not a bad idea

to try it through modifying the contents, but couldn't that break the update ability as well? I've never tried it.

Wait a minute, I never pull date revisions, it's always a versioned tag, ie, 3-1 for winex. How would I ensure that the dates are the same on the files that someone else pulled and when i pulled. If it was a date revision it might work, but not a version tag.

Well, it's the same thing. The tag is just a convenient representation of revision at certain point in time. If tags don't move, their dates (not the dates on checked out files) never change.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page