Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 13731 for review

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>
  • To: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>
  • Cc: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: PERFORCE change 13731 for review
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:51:11 -0500

Geoffrey Derber wrote:
Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
Alternatively, we could do some post-update processing to wring CVS/Entries into format whihc is a)correct b) good for us to checksum. For example, assuming CVS update brings timestamps to "the time of last change to this file", we could replace dates in CVS/Entries with the dates on the respective files. That would bring two checked out copies of CVS sources in full sync on two PCs. Would it?
BTW, I'm mirroring this into SM-Grimoire just in case somebody wants to join in.
Thanks!

Sergey.

It's not a bad idea
to try it through modifying the contents, but couldn't that break the update ability as well? I've never tried it.


Wait a minute, I never pull date revisions, it's always a versioned tag, ie, 3-1 for winex. How would I ensure that the dates are the same on the files that someone else pulled and when i pulled. If it was a date revision it might work, but not a version tag.

Geoff





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page