sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
- To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- Cc: Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:00:30 -0400
I'm talking about libraries:
# gaze install binutils|grep /usr/lib
/usr/lib/libbfd.a
/usr/lib/libbfd.la
/usr/lib/libiberty.a
/usr/lib/libopcodes.a
/usr/lib/libopcodes.la
Dufflebunk wrote:
They are (see dump at bottom). Interestingly enough though, none are stripped for me, but I'm pretty sure I've always had the strip option on. $ file `gaze install binutils | grep '^/usr/bin'` /usr/bin/addr2line: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/ar: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/as: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/c++filt: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/gprof: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/ld: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/nm: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/objcopy: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/objdump: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/ranlib: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/readelf: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/size: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/strings: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped /usr/bin/strip: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 12:17, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:Hi Julian! Is there any reason why binutils only produces static libraries (installed in /usr/lib) and not dynamic? If the only reason is "by default", should we switch to dynamic libraries? I could do that if you agree. This is a side question of trying to cast mono-debugger which doesn't like our BFD library (libbfd). I have to figure that one out anyway... If anyone's interested, it spews lots of undefined references, and based on observation that they aim at binutils 2.12 and gcc 2.9x, I think ./configure has to be patched. Thank you! Sergey. _______________________________________________ SM-Grimoire mailing list SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
-
[SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 04/07/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?,
Dufflebunk, 04/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 04/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?, Julian v. Bock, 04/07/2003
- [SM-Grimoire] Re: Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?, Julian v. Bock, 04/07/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?,
Dufflebunk, 04/07/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.