sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
[SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
- To: Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>, "Julian v. Bock" <julian AT openit.de>
- Subject: [SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 12:17:12 -0400
Hi Julian!
Is there any reason why binutils only produces static libraries (installed in /usr/lib) and not dynamic? If the only reason is "by default", should we switch to dynamic libraries? I could do that if you agree.
This is a side question of trying to cast mono-debugger which doesn't like our BFD library (libbfd). I have to figure that one out anyway... If anyone's interested, it spews lots of undefined references, and based on observation that they aim at binutils 2.12 and gcc 2.9x, I think ./configure has to be patched.
Thank you!
Sergey.
-
[SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 04/07/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?,
Dufflebunk, 04/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 04/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?, Julian v. Bock, 04/07/2003
- [SM-Grimoire] Re: Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?, Julian v. Bock, 04/07/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Small question: why binutils installs static libs only?,
Dufflebunk, 04/07/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.