Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] spell removal

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>
  • To: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • Cc: SM-Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] spell removal
  • Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 13:20:05 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
| All spells that did depend on Xft2 have been updated prior to the
| removal. The problem with having Xft2 in xfrees CONFLICTS is that it
| seems really strange to have spells in there that don't exist in the
| grimoire.
|
| I think the way it happened was correct, but there should probably have
| been an announcement on the mailinglists and news site about the removed
| spells, and what spells to dispel or recast to fix it.
|

I was trying to think of a way to have sorcery take care of it w/o the
user having to do anything about it, I do see your point on not having
it be a conflicts. Off hand I can't really think of another way to have
sorcery take care of it. I did check, and the DEPENDS files were
updated, but the actual selected dependencies choosen previously were
not updated, which is what I was noticing with the 'gaze depends Xft2'
Even with mozilla being updated after the removal, Xft2 is still listed.

Geoff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+kG/UHBxk9YxVu58RAjz8AJ9wGJnRj8Cw8SKWZX4OTV+KenDEIACgifaA
K+vNj+F2RguA030zp5Ck3Lg=
=e/qd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page