sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Ladislav Hagara <hgr AT vabo.cz>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Grimoire]MD5, LICENCE, ...
- Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 18:21:00 +0200
Hi,
I try to correct some spells and understand their syntax. For example:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE_URL[0]=ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/$SPELL/$SOURCE
MD5[0]=6b01ced3e077b326b436ab9ced57eb8a
SOURCE_URL[1]=ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/privacy/gnupg/alpha/$SPELL/$SOURCE
MD5[1]=${MD5[0]}
SOURCE_URL[2]=ftp://ftp.exobit.org/pub/security/gnupg/alpha/$SPELL/$SOURCE
MD5[2]=${MD5[0]}
SOURCE_URL[3]=ftp://download.sourcemage.org/pub/linux/distributions/sourcemage/mirror/$SOURCE
MD5[3]=${MD5[0]}
According to
http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=GrimoireGurusHandbook it
should be probably
SOURCE_URL[0]=ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/$SPELL/$SOURCE
SOURCE_URL[1]=ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/privacy/gnupg/alpha/$SPELL/$SOURCE
SOURCE_URL[2]=ftp://ftp.exobit.org/pub/security/gnupg/alpha/$SPELL/$SOURCE
SOURCE_URL[3]=ftp://download.sourcemage.org/pub/linux/distributions/sourcemage/mirror/$SOURCE
MD5[0]=6b01ced3e077b326b436ab9ced57eb8a
So, if spell has only 1 SOURCE mirrored on several sites, it should has
only MD5[0], no MD5[1], MD5[2] ... ?
Is it necessary to include
ftp://download.sourcemage.org/pub/linux/distributions/sourcemage/mirror/$SOURCE
in spells,
or it is automatically checked by sorcery ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE_URL[0]=ftp://ftp.cis.upenn.edu/pub/xv/$SOURCE
SOURCE2_URL[0]=http://our-arca.de/sorcerer/$SOURCE2
MD5[0]=6b7e76a48d9fc180f7442776a70da9a7
MD5[1]=ecc1d6cd9f43747dc88fb7e413a6919b
LICENSE[0]=GPL
SOURCE2_URL[0] should has MD5[2] or MD5[1] as written in above spell
example ?
Is SOURCE1_URL[0] the same as SOURCE_URL[0] ?
If SOURCE2 has another license as SOURCE, it should be written as
LICENSE[2] or LICENSE2[0] ?
If SOURCE2 has another licenses (dual license) it should be written as
LICENSE2[1] ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cat << EOF
xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx
EOF
Long info in spell should be written on one long line or it should be
devided to several lines ?
Of course both styles are OK, but which one is preferable ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it OK if we do not check MD5 of linux kernel patches (files in
/var/lib/sorcery/codex/test/kernels/linux/patches) ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a nice ...
- lace -
-
[SM-Grimoire]MD5, LICENCE, ...,
Ladislav Hagara, 10/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]MD5, LICENCE, ...,
Eric Schabell, 10/13/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]MD5, LICENCE, ..., Eric Sandall, 10/13/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]MD5, LICENCE, ...,
Eric Schabell, 10/13/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.