sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery
- From: Sergey A Lipnevich <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
- To: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org, sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:41:46 -0400
How can you handle setting $SPELL_CONFIG without running DETAILS?
Ryan Abrams wrote:
Hey all,
I am writing to ask about something I think may add a lot of flexibility to spellwriting. Its a rather big change in cast.
Lets run CONFIGURE /before/ running DETAILS.
The sorcery code seems to support this.
The main concern I have is twofold:
1) Do spells rely on DETAILS for their CONFIGURE to work? I /know/ mozilla and vim don't, because I have succesfully cast them on the modified version. But if your's does, let me know ASAP.
2) What haven't I thought of here? What else could break? What do we have that assumes a certain order?
In any case, this is a big change design wise (though small code-ise), and may not be a good one. I am holding off committing it to cvs until I hear back from some people. In the meantime, I will run with it on my system, and report any problems I find.
-Ryan
_______________________________________________
SM-Sorcery mailing list
SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
-
[SM-Grimoire]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery, Eric Sandall, 09/09/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
- [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery, Sergey A Lipnevich, 09/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery, Jon Svendsen, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Nick Jennings, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Nick Jennings, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
- [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery, Nick Jennings, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Nick Jennings, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.