sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
Re: [SM-Grimoire]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 20:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Ryan Abrams said:
> Hey all,
>
> I am writing to ask about something I think may add a lot of
> flexibility to spellwriting. Its a rather big change in cast.
>
> Lets run CONFIGURE /before/ running DETAILS.
>
> The sorcery code seems to support this.
>
> The main concern I have is twofold:
>
> 1) Do spells rely on DETAILS for their CONFIGURE to work? I /know/
> mozilla and vim don't, because I have succesfully cast them on the
> modified version. But if your's does, let me know ASAP.
>
> 2) What haven't I thought of here? What else could break? What do we
> have that assumes a certain order?
>
> In any case, this is a big change design wise (though small code-ise),
> and may not be a good one. I am holding off committing it to cvs until
> I hear back from some people. In the meantime, I will run with it on my
> system, and report any problems I find.
>
> -Ryan
Just a small note. :) This is mainly being requested (correct me if I'm
wrong) to ease the creation of multi-different-sourced spells, like the
kde-i18n, aspell, sorcery, etc. so that we won't need multiple spells,
like kde-i18n* and aspell*, but can query the user for which source (or
all) that they want, then use these choices with DETAILS.
One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Grimoire]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery, Eric Sandall, 09/09/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
- [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery, Sergey A Lipnevich, 09/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery, Jon Svendsen, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Nick Jennings, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Nick Jennings, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
- [SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery, Nick Jennings, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Nick Jennings, 09/10/2002
-
[SM-Grimoire]Re: [SM-Sorcery]RFC: Somewhat major change in sorcery,
Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.