sm-grimoire-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: SourceMage Grimoire Bug List
List archive
[SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions
- From: bugzilla-daemon AT bugs.sourcemage.org
- To: sm-grimoire-bugs AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions
- Date: 5 Dec 2006 22:03:31 -0000
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10198
------- Additional Comments From sobukus AT sourcemage.org 2006-12-05 16:03
-------
(In reply to comment #10)
> have changed) and on 64 bit systems gcc -c test.c -o test.o -m32 does work
> successfully, it's really the linking that fails. I honestly liked having
the
> -m64 there, even though its redundant because its a nice check for these
32bit
> _required_ packages.
Eh? I must admit that I don't get that... will configure fail when the -m64
is
there?
I just checked on a SuSE Prescott box... gcc -m64 -m32 -o test test.c works,
gcc -m32 -m64 -o test test.c does not.
Do you want the -m64 for checking if we are on 64 bits? We have the
SMGL_COMPAT_ARCHS array for that...
> I don't have objections to removing the -m64 from the
> archspecs if the issue above is addressed properly.
What exactly is the issue... what would stop working if we drop -m64?
Sorry if I am just too dumb here, but can you rephrase it?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
[SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions,
bugzilla-daemon, 12/05/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions, bugzilla-daemon, 12/05/2006
- [SM-Grimoire-Bugs] [Bug 10198] Some CFLAGS suggestions, bugzilla-daemon, 12/05/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.