SourceMage Grimoire Bug List

[bugzilla-daemon AT bugs.sourcemage.org]

http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10177





------- Additional Comments From acedit AT armory.com  2005-12-05 10:45 -------
If that was the case, then there should have been consensus and agreement 
before
the integration was done. The conversation had suggested python-libs, clearly
that wasnt your intention for the section, so it would have made sense at that
point to continue the discussion. Not to just use python-libs when its clear
that isnt the purpose. Also, Im getting further confused by this:


You also said the following:
Originally I attached the list of spells I wanted to include into this        
  
new section to avoid controversies. The list included only spells from        
  
devel and libs sections and one from http. Hence, I didn't intend to          
  
move *every* Python spell into the new section. ****Applications can stay     
      
where they are, I have no problem with that.**** Besides, most of these       
      
applications are not listed on Cheeseshop anyway so automated upgrades        
  
are not possible.        

**** added

If applications can stay where they are, what is the problem? Why is it also 
the
case that you want non-library stuff in python-libs? Maybe theres something 
I'm
not seeing here.

Note: If there is some code sharing that can be done with python application
spells and python library spells, im all for a combined section. However
python-libs is a misnomer and implies that only libraries are in the section.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.sourcemage.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.