Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: ruby-3.1: Debundle gems from the main spell

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Pavel Vinogradov <vin.public AT gmail.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: ruby-3.1: Debundle gems from the main spell
  • Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 20:25:22 -0400

haven't used ruby in years but I'm all for it. less compile time + modularity.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:33:28PM +0200, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> Hello mages,
>
> Is anyone against this?
>
> In general, with Perl, Ruby, Python, etc., we've had this sort of
> issue where new modules get added which conflict with our spells,
> or worse, fail to compile like in my current case (ruby-3.1 bundles
> rbs which fails to build against musl libc).
>
> It's always more practical to just disable bundled stuff. I've been
> testing and I couldn't find any issue with this (other than missing
> spells for the gems).
>
> Is there any better ideas? should we do this for all languages?
>
> Best regards.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page