sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement
- From: Vlad Glagolev <stealth AT tiberian.ru>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement
- Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:43:44 -0400
Yeah, understood the point.
And agree on everything below.
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:38:32 +0100
Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org> wrote:
> Am Sat, 19 Mar 2016 09:19:57 -0400
> schrieb Vlad Glagolev <stealth AT tiberian.ru>:
>
> > Thomas, I blame myself for not being available THAT time :)
> > But the timeframe I mentioned above was Jan 2015 - Nov 2015. Pretty
> > huge period to take care, right?
> >
> > > Please let's not start blaming each other for what could have
> > > happened during that time. The past year was as bad as it could be,
> > > PR-wise. Now let's get moving, shall we?
>
> I stand by that passage as a response. The website was far in other
> people's problem land as long as the move was in limbo. I am not
> motivated to contribute to the site when it is still not clear what
> will happen to it.
>
> So, let's make things happen and move on, please. SMGL barely survives
> with some spare time of people. I actually am a bit proud that I
> managed to update some installs and commit fixes to the grimoire during
> the past months. This already took an insane amount of time. Life is a
> debugging session.
>
> When we get the new website going this year, the fruits of flux'
> cauldron work with an actual release of install media … some stable
> grimoire that is relevant … SMGL could live again.
>
> Perhaps we one time have more than 5 people working on it again, so
> that we can re-start our funny business of voting for positions. So
> far, we can be happy if anyone finds time to do anything, anywhere.
>
>
> Alrighty then,
>
> Thomas
--
Vlad Glagolev <stealth AT tiberian.ru>
Attachment:
pgp0KbfcHVyOn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 03/18/2016
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Pavel Vinogradov, 03/19/2016
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Thomas Orgis, 03/19/2016
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 03/19/2016
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Thomas Orgis, 03/19/2016
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, Vlad Glagolev, 03/19/2016
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Thomas Orgis, 03/19/2016
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement,
Vlad Glagolev, 03/19/2016
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Popularity, visibility, and level of involvement, David Kowis, 03/20/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.