sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: Function to build the version number (<=name) for SCM branches
- From: Paul Vinogradov <vin.public AT gmail.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: Function to build the version number (<=name) for SCM branches
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 12:48:14 -0400
Just spell_branch and spell_autoupdate should be fine.
В Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:39:11 -0300
Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com> пишет:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 12:15:10 -0400
> Paul Vinogradov <vin.public AT gmail.com> wrote:
> > Why short names for local variables?
>
> No reason... would it be better if I rename those to something like
> spell_branch_var and spell_autoupdate_var?
>
> >
> > В Wed, 2 Jul 2014 12:03:59 -0300
> > Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com> пишет:
> >
> > > Meant number, not name. Anyway...
> > >
> > > I'm hoping to slowly clean up the grimoire of all the redundancy.
> > > Anyone against this patch?
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:36:04 -0300
> > > Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > --- a/FUNCTIONS
> > > > +++ b/FUNCTIONS
> > > > @@ -662,6 +662,17 @@ function get_up_spell_name() {
> > > > echo ${1:-$SPELL} | tr "a-z-" "A-Z_"
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +#---
> > > > +## Get branch-based/autoupdate-aware version name
> > > > +#---
> > > > +function get_scm_version() {
> > > > + local spell=$(get_up_spell_name) &&
> > > > + local vers="$spell"_BRANCH &&
> > > > + local au="$spell"_AUTOUPDATE &&
> > > > + echo "${!vers:-scm}$([[ "${!au}" = y ]] && date "+-%Y%m%d")"
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > # Move SPELL_OPTS to OPTS
> > > > # basicly generic OPTS="$SPELL_OPTS $OPTS"
> > > > function prepare_opts() {
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
Sincerely yours Paul Vinogradov
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] RFC: Function to build the version name for SCM branches,
Ismael Luceno, 07/02/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: Function to build the version number (<=name) for SCM branches,
Ismael Luceno, 07/02/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: Function to build the version number (<=name) for SCM branches,
Paul Vinogradov, 07/02/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: Function to build the version number (<=name) for SCM branches,
Ismael Luceno, 07/02/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: Function to build the version number (<=name) for SCM branches, Paul Vinogradov, 07/02/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: Function to build the version number (<=name) for SCM branches,
Ismael Luceno, 07/02/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: Function to build the version number (<=name) for SCM branches,
Paul Vinogradov, 07/02/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: Function to build the version number (<=name) for SCM branches,
Ismael Luceno, 07/02/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.