sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Tommy Boatman <tboatman_smgl AT live.com>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] KDE & soprano/nepomuk usage
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:36:50 -0600
Ditto on all points. I tend to disable the stuff unless I'm testing something.
-tommy
-----Original Message----- From: Jaka Kranjc
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 12:38 PM
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] KDE & soprano/nepomuk usage
On Monday 10 of February 2014 11:44:40 Treeve Jelbert wrote:
So my questions are;1. Not me, I've always disabled all indexing.
1. who actually uses the nepomuk features?
2. should we package the nepomuk -> baloo migration feature?
3. can we remove nepomuk and friends completely in kde-4.13, expected in
April?
2. Some people probably do use it and would find this helpful.
3. Don't see why not, if this baloo is a working replacement already.
LP
--
To err is humour
www.gemrb.org
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] KDE & soprano/nepomuk usage,
Treeve Jelbert, 02/10/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] KDE & soprano/nepomuk usage,
Jaka Kranjc, 02/10/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] KDE & soprano/nepomuk usage, Tommy Boatman, 02/13/2014
- Re: [SM-Discuss] KDE & soprano/nepomuk usage, Sukneet Basuta, 02/13/2014
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] KDE & soprano/nepomuk usage,
Jaka Kranjc, 02/10/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.