sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:17:07 -0600
On 1/27/2013 8:23 AM, Vlad Glagolev wrote:
>> Opening 6 files is difficult. Opening one file is easy. I can maintain
>
> Eh, what? Are you serious? You're propagating *such* a reason for
> breaking the modular arch of the spells? What we do have now about the
> spells is amazing from both technical and maintenance points of view.
> That's not about any difficulty. I can say so, because I work with
> grimoire long enough and know how these things are done easily and
> effectively.
If they were actually separate, I might accept this. They're not. As
I've mentioned before, the spell files are interdependent.
>
> Every spell file has its own purpose and is divided with logical
> functions, which makes it damn easy to understand, write, and more
> important -- DEBUG. That's a thing I really hate in software like
> systemd. Which breaks UNIX philosophy and makes things more difficult
> instead of making them simple for human beings.
I disagree with your statements there. systemd I find easy to understand
and use. Regardless of systemd, our spell files are not UNIX philosophy,
as they're interdependent and cannot operate on their own. They require
all the other files to operate successfully. They have interdependencies
that aren't simple pipes or data.
Thanks for your thoughts and responding via email,
David Kowis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
David Kowis, 01/25/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
flux, 01/26/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
David Kowis, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
flux, 01/27/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future, David Kowis, 01/28/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
flux, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
David Kowis, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future (focus: declarative spell and nonlinear config; chroot build),
Thomas Orgis, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future (focus: declarative spell and nonlinear config; chroot build),
David Kowis, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future (focus: declarative spell and nonlinear config; chroot build),
Jaka Kranjc, 01/27/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future (focus: declarative spell and nonlinear config; chroot build), David Kowis, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future (focus: declarative spell and nonlinear config; chroot build),
Jaka Kranjc, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future (focus: declarative spell and nonlinear config; chroot build),
David Kowis, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
Vlad Glagolev, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
David Kowis, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
Vlad Glagolev, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
David Kowis, 01/27/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future, Vlad Glagolev, 01/28/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
David Kowis, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
Vlad Glagolev, 01/27/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future, Sukneet Basuta, 01/28/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
David Kowis, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
Jaka Kranjc, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
David Kowis, 01/27/2013
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future, Jaka Kranjc, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
David Kowis, 01/27/2013
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Teh Future,
flux, 01/26/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.