Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Sukneet Basuta <sukneet AT gmail.com>]

What I would do for a quick/temporary fix is manually install those
files and/or fix/delete those symlinks at the end of INSTALL.

This is better than bypassing cleanse imo, since it will still check
the rest of gcc. gcc is a pretty important spell.

I don't know why you would want gcj though. It's effectively dead.

- Sukneet

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Javier Vasquez <j.e.vasquez.v AT gmail.com> 
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've filed a bug for gcc, but I haven't been able to figure out how to
> address it yet.
>
> The problem is that when enabling java on gcc, and with the jre tree,
> the following things are not installed:
>
> /usr/bin/gjdoc
> /usr/lib/gcj-4.6.3-12/libjawt.so
>
> And then the following links get dangling:
>
> /usr/lib/jvm/bin/javadoc
> /usr/lib/jvm/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
>
> But the spell compiles/installs successfully.  Therefore every time
> cleanse is run to check and fix, there are problems with gcc, and it
> automatically re-cast gcc, which compilation takes a good amount of
> time.
>
> I'd like to be able to bypass gcc check, or make it non-fix, to avoid
> such waste of cycles, given the problem doesn't get solved by
> re-compiling...
>
> Any hints how to do that?
>
> Also, if someone has experienced the same with gcc+java, is there any
> work around?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Javier.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss