sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss][texlive] spell change (fix?)
- From: Javier Vasquez <j.e.vasquez.v AT gmail.com>
- To: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
- Cc: "sm, discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss][texlive] spell change (fix?)
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:08:00 -0600
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org> wrote:
> Am Sat, 1 Dec 2012 23:33:26 -0600
> schrieb Javier Vasquez <j.e.vasquez.v AT gmail.com>:
>
>> Texlive was failing on me whether the optional dependency on lua51 was
>> accepted or not.
>
> Does this only apply for the case of lua51 being installed and texlive
> build refusing not to use it or is lua simply a non-optional dependency
> now? What that also does is bring to my attention the mess of lua
> versions ... I see us running into trouble when more spells want to use
> system lua and work with differing versions only. Well, embedding the
> source for the embedded scripting is not uncommon and sensible in this
> case.
>
>
> Alrighty then,
>
> Thomas
No. I didn't have lua installed, therefore I didn't opt for it, and
still the fonts generation with luatex failed...
Thx,
--
Javier.
-
[SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss][texlive] spell change (fix?),
Javier Vasquez, 12/02/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss][texlive] spell change (fix?),
Thomas Orgis, 12/03/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss][texlive] spell change (fix?), Javier Vasquez, 12/03/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [sm-discuss][texlive] spell change (fix?),
Thomas Orgis, 12/03/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.