sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:49:05 -0300
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:18:14 +0200
Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org> wrote:
> Am Mon, 4 Jun 2012 21:36:08 -0400
> schrieb Sukneet Basuta <sukneet AT gmail.com>:
>
> > > Just enforcing it globally is the easiest solution for us ...
> > > question is if we care about the small but existing (I don't have
> > > numbers) performance penalty for doing so for binaries that are
> > > not part of shared libs.
> >
> > What's the general consensus on this? native-x86_64-64 is currently
> > the only x86_64 archspec that does not have -fPIC -DPIC specified.
>
> Anyone? No opinion at all?
>
>
> Alrighty then ... not,
Isn't -fPIC default for x86_64 anyway?
I think at least for x86 it shouldn't be forced.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS,
Sukneet Basuta, 06/04/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS,
Thomas Orgis, 06/11/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS,
Ismael Luceno, 06/12/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS, Thomas Orgis, 06/12/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS,
Ismael Luceno, 06/12/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS,
Thomas Orgis, 06/11/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.