sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum AT orgis.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:18:14 +0200
Am Mon, 4 Jun 2012 21:36:08 -0400
schrieb Sukneet Basuta <sukneet AT gmail.com>:
> > Just enforcing it globally is the easiest solution for us ... question is
> > if we care about the small but existing (I don't have numbers)
> > performance penalty for doing so for binaries that are not part of shared
> > libs.
>
> What's the general consensus on this? native-x86_64-64 is currently
> the only x86_64 archspec that does not have -fPIC -DPIC specified.
Anyone? No opinion at all?
Alrighty then ... not,
Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS,
Sukneet Basuta, 06/04/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS,
Thomas Orgis, 06/11/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS,
Ismael Luceno, 06/12/2012
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS, Thomas Orgis, 06/12/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS,
Ismael Luceno, 06/12/2012
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86_64 PIC CFLAGS,
Thomas Orgis, 06/11/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.