sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Issue tracker work-flow
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:48:09 +0900
Basically my comment is just a +1 for everything that David mentioned in
his reply, but with the additional suggestion of having a wiki page or
whatever to clearly state what the workflow/semantics of the process
should be. That way developers can easily use it as a reference when
they are filing/fixing bugs. Having a reference might also help to keep
the process standardized.
--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgp5VmzonZq7t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Issue tracker work-flow,
Bor Kraljič, 10/25/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Issue tracker work-flow,
David Kowis, 10/25/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Issue tracker work-flow,
flux, 10/26/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Issue tracker work-flow,
Bor Kraljič, 10/27/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Issue tracker work-flow, flux, 10/27/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Issue tracker work-flow,
Bor Kraljič, 10/27/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Issue tracker work-flow, Bor Kraljič, 10/27/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Issue tracker work-flow,
flux, 10/26/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Issue tracker work-flow,
David Kowis, 10/25/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.