Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com>]

El Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:33:12 +0900
flux <flux AT sourcemage.org> escribió:
> Ismael Luceno (ismael.luceno AT gmail.com) wrote [11.09.10 14:16]:
> > > This is just plain bad. We have never had actual conventions for
> > > the section names, so adding section prefixes wouldn't be a
> > > convention at all. This would likely turn into the same problem
> > > as the KEYWORDS issue. Additionally, how does one move spells
> > > from one QA to another?
> > 
> > Only for topics (e.g. KDE4 spells would be on kde4*/).
> 
> No, you'd have exactly the same problem for QA. If a spell is in
> stable, but is then updated without being fully tested, it will move
> to another prefix. The same would happen for a spell that was
> previously untested, but was then properly tested and thus
> "graduated" to stable. This is, as I said, just plain bad compared to
> changing a single line in DETAILS.

I don't get it. If there's one topic per spell, and the topic doesn't
normally change over time, why would we have spells flying around
sections?

I agree that prefixes are bad for QA, but for dividing into topics they
should be fine...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature